Menu
Log in


INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR
CULTURAL PROPERTY PROTECTION

Log in

News


  • August 18, 2020 2:03 PM | Anonymous

    Reposted from The U.S. Department of State

    Today, Assistant Secretary of State for Educational and Cultural Affairs Marie Royce and Williams Director of the University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology Dr. Julian Siggers signed a Memorandum of Understanding to establish a new public-private partnership. Under this partnership, the Department of State and the Penn Cultural Heritage Center will cooperate to combat international cultural property trafficking.

    The United States is unwavering in its commitment to protect and preserve cultural heritage around the world and to combat the trafficking in cultural property that funds criminal and terrorist networks. This new partnership will facilitate consultations between U.S. law enforcement officials from the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Homeland Security Investigations, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection and experts in archaeology and art history when expertise is needed during the course of investigations. Experts from the faculty and staff of the University of Pennsylvania and other relevant universities, museums, libraries, archives, and nonprofit organizations will also participate.

    The U.S. Government’s Cultural Heritage Coordinating Committee member agencies have repatriated more than 20,000 cultural objects to more than 45 different countries, and supported nearly 100 training programs in the United States and overseas. For more information, please visit the Cultural Heritage Center website at https://eca.state.gov/cultural-heritage-center/ and the Penn Cultural Heritage Center at https://www.penn.museum/sites/chc.

    See Original Post

  • August 11, 2020 3:04 PM | Anonymous

    Reposted from Hypoallergenic

    A devastating blast ripped through the Lebanese capital of Beirut, August 4, killing at least 135 people and injuring approximately 5,000 according to the latest reports. The massive explosion, thought to be caused by a fire that broke out at a storage facility containing explosive materials at the port of Beirut, has decimated large parts of the city, including many of the Beirut’s galleries, museums, and art centers. Gallery director Gaia Foudolian and prominent architect Jean-Marc Bonfils both died in the blast.

    The explosion flattened much of the port district and sent shockwaves that shattered windows and ceilings of buildings across the city. Beirut’s city governor Marwan Abboud said that up to 300,000 people have lost their homes because of the devastation.

    Lebanon’s President Michel Aoun said that a fire detonated 2,750 tonnes of ammonium nitrate, a chemical component used in fertilizers and bombs. The chemical had been stored at the port unsafely since 2014, according to officials. The explosion is now under investigation.

    This calamity comes after months of political unrest in Lebanon and a crippling economic crisis exacerbated by the coronavirus pandemic.

    Many of the city’s leading art venues were damaged in the blast. Marfa’ Gallery and Galerie Tanit, both located close to Beirut’s Port, were hit hardest.

    Sfeir Semler Gallery, a gallery in the Karantina district north of the port, was also damaged. The gallery, a staple in Beirut’s art scene,  represents world-renowned Lebanese artists like Etel Adnan, Walid Raad, and Akram Zaatari.

    Gaia Foudolian, the director of Letitia Gallery in the Hamra district, died in the explosion, her colleagues confirmed to Hyperallergic.

    Architect Jean-Marc Bonfils, who designed the East Village building which houses Galerie Tanit in the Mar Mikhael neighborhood, also died from the blast. A gallery employee was seriously wounded, according to her colleagues.

    The blast also hit major art institutions in the city like the Sursock Museum, Ashkal Alwan, the Arab Image Foundation, and the Beirut Art Center, among others.

    Zeina Arida, the director of the Sursock Museum, was at her office when the explosion shook the building shortly after 6pm on Tuesday.

    “Luckily, the museum closed 15 minutes before the blast,” Arida told Hyperallergic in a phone conversation from Beirut, adding that no visitors or staff were hurt. The blast, she said, was “incomparable to anything we have ever witnessed.”

    The explosion shattered the museum’s doors, windows, skylights, and collapsed the ceilings of some of its rooms. It also damaged a large number of artworks in its permanent collection, including a valuable 1930 portrait of the museum’s founder Nicolas Sursock by Dutch painter Kees van Dongen. Two ceramics by the Lebanese-American artist Simone Fattal were completely destroyed, among many other items in the collection.

    “At first, we feared it was bombing, and that there would be more to follow, so we stayed in the building,” Arida described the moments after the explosion. “We quickly realized how great the damage is.”

    In the face of this massive destruction, art institutions in Beirut are helping each other to protect their collections. The Arab Image Foundation, which suffered significant damage, relocated its servers to safe storage at the Sursock Museum, by Arida’s invitation.

    “Our storage rooms are still sound and they are open to any organization that needs to store its collection,” Arida said.

    Arida, who estimates the damage to the museum to be in the millions of dollars, expects restoration efforts to be hampered by the country’s economic crisis.

    “The banks have confiscated our funds,” she said. “I don’t how we’re going to do it. It will take years to restore the museum.”

    See Original Post

  • August 11, 2020 2:39 PM | Anonymous

    Reposted from The Telegraph

    The British Museum has been battling invasive insects amid fears marauding pests helped by the absence of visitors during lockdown could damage priceless exhibits.

    Experts at the institution which houses delicate historical artefacts have warned that without the usual crowds of tourists browsing displays due to Covid-19, settling dust can make an inviting environment for problem creatures.

    Birds can enter the building and rodents gnaw their way into the Bloomsbury museum, but the greater threat comes from woodworms, moths, and carpet beetles which can devour irreplaceable items.

    These insects can make a meal of precious fabrics and textiles such as the Native American clothing and ceremonial masks displayed in the galleries, or nibble through wooden creations like totem poles.

    Dust which has settled in the absence of visitors allows the creation of an ecosystem in which pests can flourish, and in turn become inviting prey for other animals which are among the major threats to collections. 

    The British Museum told the Telegraph that it is tackling the problem of increasing insect numbers in the galleries to defend fragile treasures, and a specialist  “Integrated Pest Manager” is keeping the bugs at bay.

    The old and complex 19th century building presents problems for thorough pest control, and the prevention of infestation is done in a “holistic” way without the use of pesticides or poisons. 

    Displays in the museum also offer perfect food for invasive insects, with skin, fur, feathers, and wood all ideal sustenance for the most common problem creatures.  

    Those on open display in spaces like the Great Court are more susceptible to damage. 

    Museum staff have been monitoring the bug population in the building, conducting risk assessments for historical items which could come under threat, and pest-proofing the site.

    A spokeswoman for the institution explained the issues presented by a lack of footfall:  “The collection is housed in a splendid, but old and complex, building and our visitors play their part in controlling humidity and dust levels that create environments for pests to thrive.”

    Roosting birds and nesting rodents can make their way into the museum, damaging and dirtying the building in the process.

    Woodworm can also bore into prized objects in the collection of treasures from around the world, including delicate fabrics in the New Zealand, Aboriginal, African, and Native American sections.  

    But Integrated Pest Manager Adrian Doyle has explained that the larvae webbing moths, which are commonly found chewing through clothing, can be a major threat to the museum’s collection.

    The larvae of carpet beetles, often an issue in people’s homes, also feed on organic material.  Often a problem in natural history museums where bird and insect displays can be consumed, the British Museum is guarding against the creatures devouring fabrics.    Afghan dresses, African masks, Alaskan parkas, and Asante wooden thrones could all come under threat from these common bugs, and more everyday pieces like the museum’s wooden floorboards could also become a feast.

    Action is being taken to mitigate the risks, and the museum’s pest manager and expert curators have “been able to undertake increased deep cleaning and additional pest-proofing”.

    Measures include blocking access for pests, removing food sources and breeding grounds, purging dust from the galleries, and treating objects if insects have reached them.  

    Rodent poison has been abandoned to prevent mice and rats dying in unreachable spaces. 

    A spokeswoman for the institution said: “During lockdown, the British Museum’s Integrated Pest Manager with assistance from  world-renowned conservation and collection care team have been monitoring Museum objects and their environment.”

    She added:  “We are continuing to monitor all sites for insects and rodents using an IPM risk assessment process.

    “The care of the collection is of utmost importance to the British Museum.”

    Thanks to this work experts have “not seen any overall increase in pest activity across the museum in stores or galleries”.

    While a lack of visitors has helped create a potentially more welcome environment for insects, the absence of diners eating in the main hall of the museum has removed a key draw for rodents.  

    See Original Post

  • August 11, 2020 2:21 PM | Anonymous

    Reposted from Artnet News

    The Museum of Fine Arts, Boston is one of dozens of major cultural institutions across the US that has resorted to layoffs amid a prolonged shutdown. At the start of the month, the museum, which has been closed since March, announced that it was terminating 57 employees, with an additional 56 staff members taking voluntary retirement. Earlier, in April, the MFA furloughed more than 300 staff members—more than 40 percent of its 750-strong workforce.

    Now, current and former staffers are stepping in—independent of the museum itself—to lend a hand to those hardest hit. In the latest example of peers raising money for colleagues through mutual aid, a group of MFA employees have organized the MFA Boston Mutual Aid Fund. According to its GoFundMe page, the fund has already exceeded its $75,000 target by $25,000, raising a total of $100,175 from 230 donors in the space of just five days.

    The initiative is described as a community-based fundraiser outside the umbrella of the museum and established by and for the workers of the MFA. It is run by current and former colleagues who believe mutual aid is “one significant way to demonstrate collegiality and support.”

    Noting that “overburdened unemployment systems have often been unable to offer immediate relief,” coupled with the fact that the additional $600 a week benefit for those out of work ended last month, the MFA’s fund will give donations directly to staff who have been laid off or had their furloughs extended between March and July 2020 and who need support covering rent, bills, food, and medical expenses.

    This includes both full-time and part-time staff, restaurant associates, contract staff, fellows, teen staff, and interns, according to the GoFundMe page. “We will try to prioritize those hardest hit,” the group’s founders write. Depending on the amount of money raised, individuals can expect to receive amounts up to $500, and possibly more for extraordinary circumstances.

    Organizers said they do not expect to have any leftover funds given that financial need will be immediate and widespread.

    Mutual aid efforts—which serve as a symbol of both staff unity and the challenge of addressing inequality swiftly on an institutional level—have been launched by the Tenement Museum, the Museum of Contemporary Art in Los Angeles, and the Brooklyn Museum. (The latter saw four-figure donations from the museum’s director, former director, and board chair.)

    The MFA Boston expects to bring back 211 of the 301 furloughed workers starting in August. “The fund is a wonderful initiative and to see the outpouring of support and generosity from across the MFA family has been incredible,” a spokeswoman for the museum told Artnet News. “Our thoughts are with our colleagues during this very difficult time, and we’re grateful to the group of staff who organized the fundraiser.”

    See Original Post

  • August 11, 2020 2:18 PM | Anonymous

    Reposted from Newsweek

    A century-old anthropology museum in San Diego unveiled its new name on Sunday.

    The institution, formerly known as the Museum of Man, is now officially called the Museum of Us. In one of several announcements about the switch, executives said the museum's updated identity better represents "our work toward equity, inclusion, and decolonization."

    The museum adopted its previous moniker in 1942. At the time, "museum of man" aimed to reflect the establishment's focus on anthropology, a field of study that broadly encompasses scientific and cultural research pursuits related to human behavior.

    Conversations about the ways in which its use of "man" was problematic began to circulate almost three decades ago, after community members noted its gendered, colonial implications.

    "Not only did the Museum's old name support patriarchal systems, but it represented a colonial past that perpetuated racist narratives and harmed Indigenous communities," the museum said in a statement shared to its website on Sunday. "Today, we are addressing our colonial legacy in a number of ways, including actively listening to the voices of San Diego community members, Indigenous Peoples nationally, and our national and international visitors."

    Following more than two years of discussions among stakeholders and members of the public, the museum said its trustee board officially approved the name change at the end of June. Its former website URL now redirects users to a new one consistent with the update. A pop-up message introducing visitors to the switch appears when loading the home page.

    "It's us! Your new museum," the message reads. "Formerly known as the Sn Diego Museum of Man, we have begun the process of changing our name to better reflect our commitment to inclusivity."

    Newsweek reached out to the Museum of Us for additional comments, but did not receive a reply in time for publication.

    The museum board's decision to move away from a name reminiscent of the United States', and California's, history of colonization came amid a national movement to effect similar changes elsewhere. Demonstrations against systemic racism and police abuse that took place after George Floyd's death sparked widespread efforts to remove statues, and rename public spaces, with ties to the Confederacy.

    Protesters and lawmakers have faced pushback against their initiatives, with some leaders, like President Donald Trump, arguing for the preservation of memorials linked to the Confederacy. Still, numerous symbols were taken down nationwide over the past two months. Local leaders in Virginia celebrated the removal of Confederate memorials from the state's capitol last week, and polls conducted around the same time showed most Americans support efforts to do so across the country.

    See Original Post

  • August 11, 2020 2:13 PM | Anonymous

    Reposted from Artnet News

    Workers at the Philadelphia Museum of Arts (PMA) voted to unionize today, less than 48 hours after the institution announced that it had laid off 25 percent of its staff.

    The bargaining group, which is affiliated with the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) District Council 47, is the first wall-to-wall union at a museum in the country, meaning that any employee who works more than four hours a week at the institution is eligible to join.

    After months of negotiations between the union and the institution’s leadership, a mail-in vote for all museum employees was conducted between July 9 and July 30 by the National Labor Relations Board, a federal organization. 

    The results, tallied this morning, showed that 89 percent of workers agreed to join the union, far surpassing the 50 percent mark needed for a win.  

    “It feels fucking awesome,” says Adam Rizzo, a member of the union’s organizing committee.

    Rizzo and dozens of other employees watched live on Zoom today as the Labor Relations Board conducted the final count. “We knew we had the support already. It felt great to see the votes come in in person, but it seems like the museum wasted a bunch of time and resources fighting this. Still, we’re absolutely thrilled.”

    “Just as we respected the right of staff to organize at the outset, we also respect today’s outcome,” Timothy Rub, director and CEO of the museum, said in a statement to Artnet News. 

    “As we move towards the development of a collective bargaining agreement, we pledge to work in good faith to achieve the best outcome for our staff and for this institution.”

    Conversations about forming a union began percolating over a year ago, when a Google Spreadsheet of museum workers’ salaries went public, Nicole Cook, a member of the union organizing committee, told Artnet earlier this year.

    After reaching a “supermajority” of eligible museum employees in favor of unionizing, the group of workers announced their official intent to do organize on May 22.

    But the PMA denied the request for voluntary recognition, which would have eliminated the need for a vote. They cited objections to the size and makeup of the proposed group and instead argued that there should be two units, one each for “core” and “non-core” employees, which would dilute the influence of a singular group.

    “That actually ended up working in our favor because it pissed so many people off,” Rizzo says. “No one wants to be told they’re not a core employee to the museum’s mission.”

    In June, the museum retained the services of a notorious union-busting law firm, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, which has. has deep ties with the museum. It is a Gold-level corporate supporter, and Timothy W. Levin, one of the firm’s lawyers, is on the museum’s executive board.

    In June, days after the museum announced plans to furlough more than 100 employees—amounting to more than 20 percent of its staff—the institution and the union agreed to hold the mail-in election. 

    In a big win for the union, both parties agreed to count the votes of recently furloughed or laid-off employees. 

    On Tuesday, August 4, the museum let go 85 employees for good, while an additional 42 left through voluntary separation agreements, according to the Philadelphia Inquirer. Those who signed separation agreements were ineligible for today’s vote. The museum also contested over 40 voters, arguing that they weren’t eligible.

    “We did this because we really care about the museum,” Rizzo says. “We hope that this will actually affect some positive change.”

    See Original Post

  • August 04, 2020 3:56 PM | Anonymous

    Reposted from Artnet News

    Beware the art museum selfie: another inconsiderate art lover has wreaked havoc in their quest for the perfect photo op. This time, the victim was a historic plaster model by the Italian artist Antonio Canova (1757–1822).

    On July 31, a misguided Austrian tourist snapped the toes off the Neoclassical sculpture Pauline Bonaparte as Venus Victrix, housed at Possagno’s Museo Antonio Canova in northeast Italy, while attempting to sit on its lap for a photo.

    Selfies have become something of a scourge for museums in recent years, leading to accidents that have damaged valuable artworks around the world.

    In this most recent case, the guilty party “left the museum in a hurry without reporting the incident,” according to a post on the institution’s Facebook page. Staff discovered the damage shortly thereafter, and reviewed security footage to find the responsible party.

    As museums in Italy reopened after the shutdown, they began to require foreign visitors to sign in by name, which meant that the museum was able to identify the responsible individual—but he or she has not been tracked down since fleeing the scene of the accident, and their name has not been released to the press.

    Vittorio Sgarbi, an Italian politician and controversial art critic who serves as president of the Antonio Canova Foundation, called on Italian police in a Facebook post to find the person responsible for this “unprecedented stupidity” and take him into custody, “not allowing him to remain unpunished and return to his homeland.”

    New proposed legislation in Italy would increase the maximum sentence for vandalizing art to eight years in prison on top of a fine of €100,000 ($117,000).

    The 1804 plaster sculpture is a survivor of World War I, when a Christmas bombing raid hit the museum in 1917. A 2004 restoration reattached the figure’s severed head and repaired damage to the cloth, hands, and feet, according to la Repubblica.

    This time around, the museum isn’t delaying efforts to fix the piece. “Luckily, we found the broken parts of the gypsum,” museum director Moira Mascotto told the Austrian Press Agency. “That helps us with the restoration.”

    The artwork is part of the museum’s gypsotheca, or “collection of plasters,” containing the original plaster models for Canova’s finished marble works. Established by the artist’s half-brother, Giambattista Sartori, in 1829, it is Europe’s largest monographic gypsotheca.

    The celebrated marble version of the statue, which depicts Paolina Bonaparte Borghese, Napoleon’s sister, as Venus, is part of the collection of the Galleria Borghese in Rome.

    See Original Post

  • August 04, 2020 3:52 PM | Anonymous

    Reposted from AAM

    You come into your office, juggling your gym bag and a cup of hot coffee, and boot up your laptop to an ominous red and black screen that announces:

    “All your files and documents have been encrypted!”

    Congratulations, you’ve been hacked.

    Last week the New York Times published an article highlighting the rise in ransomware attacks: incidents in which hackers lock down entire computer networks and demand payments to let users recover their data and regain control of their systems. The author cites data documenting a 41 percent increase in ransomware attacks from 2018 to 2019, for a total of over 205,000 reported attacks last year. The average ransom payment jumped to over $190 thousand. And, as the article notes, these numbers probably underrepresent the true costs of such attacks, as organization often don’t want to publicize that they have been hacked.

    To that point, I know of at least three museums that have been the targets of ransomware attacks, but so far none have been willing to go on the record about their experiences. Evidently ransomware is the digital equivalent of STDs—but the stigma of (unwarranted) shame attached being a victim is misplaced and counterproductive. By sharing information, museums can become better able to defend themselves and recover from such attacks.

    Meanwhile, I’ve compiled some facts on ransomware drawing on free web resources for training and response. Each of the sources excerpted below provide a variety of advice and resources. Take the time to explore them and bookmark useful information—hopefully before an attack takes place!

    What is ransomware?

    “Ransomware is a type of malware that blocks access to a system, device, or file until a ransom is paid. This is achieved when the ransomware encrypts files on the infected system (crypto ransomware), threatens to erase files (wiper ransomware), or blocks system access (locker ransomware) for the victim. The ransom amount and contact information for the cyber threat actor (CTA) is typically included in a ransom note that appears on the victim’s screen after their files are locked or encrypted. Sometimes the CTA only includes contact information in the note and will likely attempt to negotiate the ransom amount once they are contacted.” 

    How does ransomware infect computers?

    “Here are some of the ways computers and mobile devices can be infected:

    • Links in emails or messages in social networks — In this type of attack, the victim clicks a malicious link in an email attachment or a message on a social networking site.
    • Pay per install — This popular method attacks computers that are already part of a botnet (a group of infected computers under the control of criminals called botmasters), further infecting them with additional malware. Bot herders, criminals who look for security vulnerabilities, are paid to find these opportunities.
    • Drive-by downloads — This form of ransomware is installed when a victim clicks on a compromised website. McAfee Labs researchers have seen an increase in drive-by downloads. In particular, users of some streaming video portals have been hit.”

    Is my museum at risk?

    Yes. Hackers are targeting a wide variety of businesses, large and small, as well as individual users. Dozens of cities have been hit by ransomware attacks—and if your museum is part of a municipality, your data may be compromised as well. Keep in mind that university museums inherit the risk of their parent organizations, too. (Last year Regis and Stevens Universities suffered devastating attacks.)

     How can I prevent ransomware attacks?

    • Update and patch your computer. Ensure your applications and operating systems (OSs) have been updated with the latest patches. Vulnerable applications and OSs are the target of most ransomware attacks
    • Use caution with links and when entering website addresses. Be careful when clicking directly on links in emails, even if the sender appears to be someone you know. Attempt to independently verify website addresses (e.g., contact your organization’s helpdesk, search the internet for the sender organization’s website or the topic mentioned in the email). Pay attention to the website addresses you click on, as well as those you enter yourself. Malicious website addresses often appear almost identical to legitimate sites, often using a slight variation in spelling or a different domain (e.g., .com instead of .net).
    • Open email attachments with caution. Be wary of opening email attachments, even from senders you think you know, particularly when attachments are compressed files or ZIP files.
    • Keep your personal information safe. Check a website’s security to ensure the information you submit is encrypted before you provide it.
    • Verify email senders. If you are unsure whether or not an email is legitimate, try to verify the email’s legitimacy by contacting the sender directly. Do not click on any links in the email. If possible, use a previous (legitimate) email to ensure the contact information you have for the sender is authentic before you contact them.
    • Inform yourself. Keep yourself informed about recent cybersecurity threats and up to date on ransomware techniques. You can find information about known phishing attacks on the Anti-Phishing Working Group website. You may also want to sign up for CISA product notifications, which will alert you when a new Alert, Analysis Report, Bulletin, Current Activity, or Tip has been published.
    • Use and maintain preventative software programs. Install antivirus software, firewalls, and email filters—and keep them updated—to reduce malicious network traffic.”

    Are there training programs that can help prevent successful attacks?

    Yes. The Alliance uses KnowBe4 for its security awareness training. There are a number of similar programs like AwareGO and Mimecast. All programs follow a similar framework, reoccurring short video training sessions mixed in with periodic assessments. Administrators can use the results to gauge the organization’s risk and impact of training program. Costs are based on the number of users enrolled in the program and start as low as a couple dollars per month. Since threats are evolving it is important to view this training as on-going and not a one-time rubber stamp.

    I’ve been attacked by ransomware—what’s the first thing I should do?

    The BackBlaze Blog recommends that your first step should be to isolate the infection:

    “The first thing to do when a computer is suspected of being infected is to isolate it from other computers and storage devices. Disconnect it from the network (both wired and Wi-Fi) and from any external storage devices. Cryptoworms actively seek out connections and other computers, so you want to prevent that happening. You also don’t want the ransomware communicating across the network with its command and control center.

    Be aware that there may be more than just one patient zero, meaning that the ransomware may have entered your organization or home through multiple computers, or may be dormant and not yet shown itself on some systems. Treat all connected and networked computers with suspicion and apply measures to ensure that all systems are not infected.”

    What’s next? 

    Your museum’s IT department or security office may have a procedure in place to respond to ransomware attacks. This may include shutting down and isolating other devices that may have been connected to the infected computer and ensuring that your backup data (you have backup data, right?) is offline and secured.

    Where can we get help with responding to a ransomware attack?

    Many firms offer to help with recovery of data after a ransomware attack. Be cautious if you decide to engage such a firm—an investigation by Pro Publica revealed that some companies that promise to recover encrypted data simply pay the hackers and pass the charge on to the victim. I have not found a credible, independent review of reputable recovery services. Let me know if you have any source to share.

    Should we pay the ransom?

    Opinions vary, but many cybersecurity experts (including Lee Mathews, writing for Forbes) argue that you should never pay a ransomware ransom. For one thing, as Mathews points out, only 19% of ransomware targets who pay the ransom actually get their data back. The NYT article I cite at the beginning of this article makes the case that paying ransoms will fuel more attacks, by “giving attackers more confidence that they will get paid.”

    Can we recover our data without paying a ransom?

    Maybe. Even as hackers create new ransomware programs, programmers race to create encryption programs to free locked data. You can work with a forensics and data recovery program to try to recover what you can. That said, your best recovery strategy is to have a good backup system.

    Should we report the attack?

    The Department of Homeland Security asks that you report ransomware attacks immediately to CISA at www.us-cert.gov/report, a local FBI Field Office, or Secret Service Field Office.

    See Original Post

  • August 04, 2020 3:48 PM | Anonymous

    Reposted from Pinnacol Assurance

    Summer is off to a blazing start, with temperatures approaching record levels in many places

    Unfortunately, heat plus the masks employees in many industries are wearing to help control the spread of COVID-19 could add up to a higher risk of developing heat stress, which can lead to heatstroke, rashes, exhaustion or cramps

    Employees who work outdoors or in restaurant kitchens may be especially vulnerable, since they spend time in places where high temperatures are already a concern. 

    Fortunately, you can help your employees stay safe this summer while helping control the spread of the novel coronavirus. 

    10 ways to avoid heat stress while wearing masks

    1. Remind employees to hydrate regularly

    Hydration is critical to avoiding heat stress. Let employees sip from water bottles as they work. Discourage them from sharing water bottles, which can raise the risk of COVID-19 transmission. 

    2. Monitor workers with preexisting conditions

    People with asthma, emphysema or other lung- or breathing-related conditions may be at greater risk for breathing problems with masks, and these issues can worsen with heat stress. Offer at-risk workers extra breaks or other accommodations. 

    3. Post signs listing symptoms of heat stress

    ‍Alert employees to heat stress symptoms such as thirst, fatigue, nausea, dizziness or weakness, and heavy sweating. Tell them to seek help as soon as possible if they experience multiple signs. 

    4. Allow employees more breaks

    ‍Even giving workers 10 to 15 minutes to walk outside and remove their masks helps. You can also create a shady or air-conditioned area for employees to take socially distant breaks.

    5. Use disposable non-medical masks

    ‍Paper masks may feel lighter and easier to breathe through than cloth masks. Expandable pleats in the mask allow better airflow to the mouth for a more comfortable experience. 

    6. Buy backup masks

    ‍Wet masks make it difficult to breathe. Give employees new ones if theirs become sweaty. Wet masks also do not filter air as well, and microorganisms may grow in wet masks.

    7. Encourage light-colored masks

    ‍Light-colored masks absorb fewer ultraviolet rays than dark-colored ones, keeping the mask cooler for employees working outside. 

    8. Let workers wear hats 

    ‍Hats protect your employees’ faces from the sun, making them less likely to overheat. 

    9. Change working hours

    ‍If possible, let employees who work outdoors begin their shifts earlier in the day, when temperatures are lower. 

    10. Provide sweat-wicking clothes

    ‍Offer employees sweat-wicking uniforms that will keep them cooler and reduce the chance of heat stress. 

    See Original Post

  • August 04, 2020 3:44 PM | Anonymous

    Reposted from Forbes

    Edward Hopper’s Nighthawks. Grant Woods’ American Gothic. Georges Seurat’s A Sunday on the Grande Jatte.

    All of them among the most recognizable images in art history. 

    All of them in the permanent collection at the Art Institute of Chicago.

    All of them from the hand of a white male artist depicting white people.

    As art museums nationwide commit to becoming more welcoming to black audiences, the Art Institute of Chicago faces a question: how does it best balance continuing to highlight its treasure trove of art history’s greatest hits from white artists – Monet, van Gogh, Chagall, Picasso, Pollack, Warhol–with work from black artists, depicting subjects more relevant to the 30% African-American community it serves locally?

    “The awareness with which we consider what we're showing in our galleries and how we're interpreting artworks in the gallery has become more important, instead of being on the list of things to do it's, number one,” Sarah Guernsey, Deputy Director and Senior Vice President, Curatorial Affairs at the Art Institute of Chicago told Forbes.com.

    The museum reopened to the public following its coronavirus closure on July 30, several years into multi-faceted efforts to be more inclusive of black voices. Importantly to the Art Institute, that inclusion starts from within.

    “For us, it's not just an external approach to audiences, but it's also about our internal staff culture,” Guernsey said. “We want to make sure that our internal culture is supportive in the way we want to invite external guests.”

    One new initiative in that direction is the development of a department titled “people and culture.”

    “It is meant to work on having a better staff culture with equity, inclusion and anti-racism at the core, emphasizing the need for our staff culture and engagement to impact how we're presenting art in the galleries,” Guernsey explained.

    The museum, additionally, has an equity forum, employees who volunteer to take positions pushing the institution’s anti-racism work forward. Within the equity forum is a group called “narratives and content.” 

    “This is a group of people that as we hit on some of the issues of social identity in the exhibitions or in acquisitions, if we have questions we want to consider more broadly, they're willing to work through challenging topics without it just being one curator who thinks he or she knows what to do,” Guernsey said. 

    The efforts continue with staff color affinity groups, providing employees of color a space to gather and talk, “and we're working to create another place for dialogue where we're putting together meetings with the director and black staff to talk about their concerns because we realize that everyone is reacting to the brutal murders of George Floyd and others, but that it impacts our black staff more than anyone else,” Guernsey noted, adding that, “we are working really hard to center black voices inside the museum, to make it a welcoming place for staff where they feel supported… really thinking about black staff and not speaking for black staff.”

    One of the museum’s longest running efforts toward inclusion is its “leadership advisory committee” dating back to the 1990s. This group of black supporters consult with curators and the learning and public engagement department on acquisitions, exhibitions and programming in an effort to decentralized decision making.

    Subtle, but significant, tweaks to guest services have also been undertaken to place black artists on a more equal footing with their celebrity white counterparts. One such example takes shape in the visitor guides highlighting what to see in an hour. 

    Hundreds of thousands of tourists annually stream into the museum. Many of them are looking primarily to breeze through for an in-person glimpse of the images they’ve read about in books and seen on posters before moving on to the city’s next attraction. 

    “Years ago, you’d look at the ‘what to see in an hour’ (guide) and it was all 19th century masterpieces by Seurat, Monet, and we have very intentionally moved away from just listing those same 10 objects every time in the ‘what to see in an hour’ suggested tour,” Guernsey said. “As much as it's our job to share with the world the famous artworks, we want also to educate people on artwork they may not have noticed or considered.”

    One such example is Archibald Motley’s electric, jubilant, purple juke joint utopia Nightlife, a previously less-celebrated painting from a black artist now elevated to the stature of Monet’s haystacks or van Gogh’s bedroom.

    “There are ways that artwork becomes famous and part of it is putting it in the public eye and letting people learn about it,” Guernsey said. “We definitely take that seriously, we can't just share the most famous objects that everybody expects, we want to share more to broaden the cannon and broaden our visitors understanding of art history.”

    To that end, the Art Institute will be presenting a rich exhibition schedule of black artists through the remainder of 2020 and 2021. Richard Hunt, Joseph Yoakum, Bisa Butler and the Obama presidential portraits–his by Kehinde Wiley and hers by Amy Sherald–all take center stage. Hunt is a Chicago native, Yoakum lived there later in life until his death, and the Obama’s, of course, arrived in Washington, D.C. from Illinois. 

    “We are a major national art museum, but we are Chicago-centric,” Guernsey said. “It's our civic role, but it's also just a proud part of who we are to look to Chicago voices.”

    While not a Chicagoan, a mostly-unknown black artist taking center stage as the museum opens with an exhibition alongside El Greco and Henri Toulouse-Lautrec, two traditional art history stalwarts, is Malangatana Ngwenya (1936–2011). 

    “Malangatana: Mozambique Modern” brings together over 40 key paintings and drawings, serving as both the first survey of the artist’s early work since his death and the first solo exhibition of a modern African painter at the Art Institute. 

    The museum vividly describes his work as, “an aesthetic defined by a dense assembly of figures; phantasmagoric depictions of animals, humans, and supernatural creatures; and a palette of both bright and dark colors.”

    “Our exhibition is looking at the early part of his career alongside the backdrop of the social, cultural and political conditions in Mozambique that in some ways he was commentating on,” Felicia Valentine Mings, Academic Curator, Department of Academic Engagement and Research, told Forbes.com. “It’s a tumultuous moment as it was the height of the anti-colonial struggle.”

    The exhibition covers the period 1959-1975, 1975 being the year Mozambique was finally granted independence from Portugal, one of the last African nations to realize its freedom from colonial rule. 

    Malangatana’s unforgettably gruesome figures fall nicely into an art historical through line connecting him to Hieronymus Bosch, Goya and Dali. 

    “He would have most likely absorbed some of that material while also really looking to his Ronga cultural background and bringing in the monstrous forms, the dense composition, the fantastic themes pulling from culture and folk lore and bringing that together,” Mings said. “It’s really exciting to think about how we can see his work in dialogue with modern African artists who were practicing on the continent at that time as well as European artists who we see resonance with.”

    “Malangatana: Mozambique Modern” is on view through November 16. 

    Richard Hunt’s exhibition is tentatively set for an opening date of September 18, 2020, followed by Bisa Butler on November 14th. In 2021, both the Joseph Yoakum and Obama portrait exhibits are scheduled to debut in June.

    See Original Post

  
 

1305 Krameria, Unit H-129, Denver, CO  80220  Local: 303.322.9667
Copyright © 2015 - 2018 International Foundation for Cultural Property Protection.  All Rights Reserved